Ancient paper that is writing The ancient criteria for clinical writing

$

Description

Ancient paper that is writing The ancient criteria for clinical writing

Abstract

The paper that is scientific been developed within the last three hundreds of years into an instrument to communicate the outcomes of medical inquiry. Scientific writing will need to have of the standard that is high its related to the entire process of gaining knowledge when it comes to learned also as brand new learners. In ancient period, specific methodology that is writing used because of the boffins to organize standard and highly-scientific manuscripts within the industry. Tools such as Tantrayukti (techniques for writing/decoding treatise), Tachchhilya (inclinations), Kalpana (compositions), etc., have already been described when you look at the classics to steadfastly keep up the product quality requirements of clinical literary works. As a result of well-established writing practices, clinical literatures such as for example Samhita (Ayurvedic texts), Samgrahagrantha (compendia), Nighantu (lexicons), etc., had been written uniformly and high quality literary works ended up being created. The traits of great writing that is scientific Shastra (treatise) have already been described within the Vimanasthana of Charaka Samhita that will be referred to as Tantraguna. The Tantraguna covers the main element points associated with composing such as for instance language, purchase, size, method, etc. After reviewing and analyzing these Tantraguna, it may be figured the ancient writing technique could be weighed against some aspect to present introduction, http://www.eliteessaywriters.com techniques, outcomes and conversation framework of clinical writing. This analysis may make it possible to enable and bolster the present requirements of clinical writing by modifying new components of ancient writing method.

Keyword Phrases: Charaka Samhita, Tantraguna, Vimanasthana

Simple tips to cite this short article:
Vyas HA, Panara K. Tantraguna – The ancient requirements for systematic writing. AYU 2016;37:158-62

Simple tips to cite this URL:
Vyas HA, Panara K. Tantraguna – The criteria that are ancient systematic writing. AYU serial online 2016 cited 2019 Aug 2;37:158-62. Offered by:

Introduction

Composing is a really part that is important of; it really is utilized to report and communicate a few ideas, tasks and findings to others. Medical writing can just take numerous kinds from a laboratory notebook to a project report and from a paper in a educational log to a write-up in a clinical mag. 1 Good writing requires just as much care and thought given that experiments or researches which can be completed. Composing a research paper or review article or text for medical technology isn’t a easy task. Nowadays, as scientific studies are needed for every industry of technology, its writing technique calls for uniformity in its presentation for clear interaction. Scientific documents must clearly be written and concisely making sure that visitors with back ground like the writer can comprehend effortlessly just what he’d done and just how he’d done. Presently, numerous recommendations are for sale to systematic writing but introduction, practices, results and conversation (IMRAD) structure 2 is more scientific and popular in scientist community. While composing an investigation article, only facts should really be mentioned with proof which will be predicated on careful findings. But, in literary research, hypothetical writing might be permissible but once again it should be supported with strong and authentic traditional recommendations or carefully gathered genuine large information. Construction, style, language, and general presentation of ideas will also be a number of the essential aspects to be looked at for composing a high quality paper.

In ancient age, literatures of varied areas have already been written in Samskrit language. Further, similarity written down types of texts of each and every field suggested that uniform writing methodology ended up being adopted by the ancient researchers to organize standard and highly-scientific manuscripts. Information on such methodology are located in Charaka Samhita, one of many textbooks of ancient medical technology. Writer of the written text, Acharya Charaka described writing methodology while describing the choice requirements for top-quality manuscript to a brand new scholar. 3 In this critical review, Tantraguna happen put together from Charaka Samhita; further, it had been interpreted and compared to current tools associated with writing that is scientific.

TAG:2Tantraguna: The Traits Of Great Scientific Writing/TAG:2

Tantraguna happen described in 8 chapter that is th of of Charaka Samhita. “Vimanasthana” section had been written when it comes to quantitative determination for the certain characteristics of therapy such as for instance Rasa, Dravya, Dosha and Vikara. 4 The chapter that is eighth of relates to the dedication for the particular demands to treat conditions. 5 In the beginning of the chapter, scholars are encouraged for the choice of a regular text that is medical good writing. To facilitate the choice, Acharya Charaka described the traits of great writing that is scientific are elaborated as Tantraguna. Every single Tantraguna is interpreted and furnished the following.

Sumahat (well comprehensive)

Composing should really be comprehensive. It must cover all of the necessary facets of the subject. Right Here, additionally, it is become taken into account that in line with the structure regarding the article, size may be determined. In the duration of the manuscript, Vriddha Vagbhatta opines that it should neither too long nor too quick. 6 This could be a criterion for research article or systematic paper, or a novel; writer should protect all of the aspects with important details.

Yashasvi-Dheera-Purusha-Sevita and Apta-pujita (accepted by medical fraternity)

Text which can be getting used by qualified, experienced individuals associated with the field that is same be viewed authentic. This characteristic indicates that the main topic of text must be popular in medical community as well as its acceptability and applicability of real information in accordance training is high.

Arthabahulam (fine interpreted)

The writing should expose broad and accurate interpretations with a restricted quantity of terms. The information associated with topic should immensely be concise and meaningful. For structure of succinct and matter that is precise ancient writers of Ayurveda utilized some methodology to facilitate simple transmission, similarly good for all. The definitions underlying the written text can be interpreted with due regards to your concepts of elaboration (Nirdesha) and reduction (Uddesha). 7

Trividha Shishya Buddhihitam (clearly expressed)

Literary meaning of this particular feature is the fact that the treatise ought to be equally suited to the comprehension of three types of students, i.e. extremely smart, moderate and low. What this means is that systematic paper ought to be obviously expressed, effortlessly understandable and appealable to all or any forms of people pertaining to specific field i.e. from very intellectuals to normalcy.

Apagata Punarukta Dosha (no repetition of content or without plagiarism)

Systematic writing must certanly be free of repetition for the topic. Ergo, repetition of topic in exact exact exact same or various sentences in paper resulting in enhance for the wide range of pages is generally accepted as inferior of work. “Punarukta Dosha” might also suggest toward plagiarism. Making use of other scientists’ tips or any areas of their writing as the very own is a severe offence understood as plagiarism. Therefore, Tantraguna additionally implies that information mentioned when you look at the scholarly research really should not be copied from previous research works.

Study must certanly be carried out and evaluated by impartial, genuine, and systematic individual. Bias 8 might be raised from any conflict of great interest in experiments or by study carried out through nonscientific techniques. Both types of bias result in the generation of false and data that are unscientific. Thus, scholar should really be well built with thorough familiarity with particular field and really should n’t have any conflict.

123